Under the Table Politics
http://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/028GZS - Under the Table Politics.html
|
|
Under the Table Politicshttp://www.gndzerosrv.com/Web%20Pages/028GZS - Under the Table Politics.html |
Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 04-18-02
Please direct your attention to Table 8-2 of the Greenbook entitled "Interstate Child Support Guidelines" submitted by Pirog, Klotz, and Buyers of the Institute of Family and Social Responsibility (FASR) /1. FASR is paid by the Federal Government to be the clearinghouse for child support statistics for this country /2.
These feminists from FASR have told our legislators that California demands 18% of an NCP's pay regarding 2 children and earning $4,400/mo. The state of California actually demands 40% of the NCP's pay. The guideline reported for the rest of the states are just as fraudulent and I feel is a form of treason.
The legislators at the federal level are being told that the child support guidelines for their respective states are reasonable. They are being told that the most aggressive child support guideline in the nation is imposed by the state of Indiana, demanding 20% of the NCP's pay regarding 2 children and earning $4,400/mo. It is not surprising that FASR is based out of Indiana State University at Bloomington (UIB).
I have conveyed this discovery to the LA CA FBI, CA Councilman Alan Lowenthal, CA Congressman Stephen Horn, CA Attorney General Bill Lockyer, CA DCSS Public Information and Response Unit, LA County CA DCSS, Monterey County CA DCSS, ANCPR, ACFC, and on March 14, 2002, I had the opportunity to enter this fact for the record in Los Angeles County Municipal Court, Division 271 (Case # 9CRO4751).
Our legislators are being told that the anticipated demands in Social Security benefits that will be demanded to service "baby boomers" will bankrupt the system /3. They are being told that this aggressive welfare reform is necessary to prevent this eminent financial disaster. These "baby boomer" parents are being systematically destroyed regardless of race, creed, or social standing in an attempt to avert this anticipated disaster. Heterosexual taxpayers that dare to raise children are being sacrificed in response to this financial oversight but the government is telling the public it is in the name of our children.
Prophecy has foretold that "666" is the mark of the beast and I believe this is true. USC 42 666 is a depressing rant that sentences NCPs to eternal damnation in the name of their children. It is a repulsive read that will make even the most courageous man weep. However, miraculous as it may seem, there is a passage that grants the NCP protection and is found in subparagraph B6D(i). B6D(i) forbids an employer from terminating or refusing to hire an NCP due to child support garnishments. It proves that "even a blind squirrel can find an acorn sometimes" and is a pearl of wisdom that is ignored by most states. If you believe that we can "see the world in a grain of sand" you can realize why this protection is denied to the NCP. Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) and Child Support Enforcement (CSE) does not get involved until the NCP loses his job and falls behind in child support payments. The state of California transferred $309 million dollars into the ChildCare and Development Fund (CCDF) in 1999 with regard to TANF operations /4, while pocketing $189 million in 1998 with regard to CSE operations /5. California leads the nation in the exploitation of children in this nation.
Policy Studies Inc. (PSI) just finished conducting the four-year review of California's child support guideline. California Family Code 5290 is the only law listed under the "Unacceptable Practices" category and exists to comply with USC 42 666 B6D(i). CAFC 5290 sets a fine of $500 maximum against employers who fire or refuse to hire an NCP due to child support garnishments. Clearly, this will not deter this " Unacceptable Practice" and will only serve to promote it. It is not utilized by CSE to recover child support or recognized as a lawful excuse in a criminal nonsupport charge (CAPC 270).
Furthermore, I would like to point out that the accompanying subparagraph USC 666 B6D(ii) requires the state make provision for a fine against an employer failing to withhold child support garnishments from the employees wages. PSI may be guilty of ignoring the protection granted by the federal government to the NCP while allowing the employer of the NCP to ignore wage withholding altogether.
All NCPs are urged to demand that their employers refuse to withhold child support garnishments, until the state of California is compliant with the federal mandate, until PSI and FASR are made to answer for their terrorism, and until the investigation into the level of involvement with regards to this conspiracy is concluded.
Jim Untershine, 824 E Pass Rd #3, Gulfport, MS 39507, gzs@gndzerosrv.com, www.gndzerosrv.com
Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.